Care versus cure is a topic I struggle with as I write about aging. This site is about caring for some one with dementia.
I assume by now that you have actually heard the information: Google wishes to tackle the aging process. Specifically, they announced the launch of Calico, “a new business that will concentrate on wellness and well-being, in certain the difficulty of aging and associated diseases.”.
Because, states Larry Page, the CEO of Google, with some “moonshot thinking around healthcare and biotechnology, I think we can enhance millions of lives.”.
TIME magazine announced Calico on its cover ” Can Google solve death?”
Google’s objective, it seems is to find means to extend human life expectancy and essentially fend off maturing and aging.
The wellness care community and business community today share a basic interest in discovering ways to achieve higher value in health care. The ultimate objective for both neighborhoods is to keep individuals healthy, prevent the chronic ailments that eat a huge portion of our healthcare dollars, use clinical interventions appropriately and just when needed, and develop an economically sustainable strategy in the delivery of health care. While we want to foster innovation and story therapies against illness, we likewise acknowledge that, whenever possible, avoidance of condition before it is established is the better option.
And therein lies the controversy. Whether it’s Google or a high-powered collaboration between NEJM and HBR, everyone is captivated by disease prevention and innovative treatments. All the dementia organizations focus on a cure versus investing on how to provide person centered dementia care.
More on Care versus Cure…
The problem of disease prevention
Now, it’s not that I protest prevention. I would love absolutely nothing better than to see a lot of Americans living healthier lives, with more consistent and regular workouts, making better nutritional choices, experiencing less weight problems, and less stress.
And of course it will be a fantastic day when we become actually able to cure or stop awful diseases such as Alzheimer’s, or Parkinson’s, or cancer.
When we perpetually concentrate on treatments and disease prevention, where does that leave the rest of us– patients, care givers and health care professionals, who are presently struggling to handle several chronic illness, including dementia and other age-related problems?
Consider this: the most urgent wellness policy problem of the next 10-20 years is to find ways to provide effective and caring healthcare to the Medicare population. And provide it at a cost we can sustain. For the present aging population, it’s too late for avoidance or prevention of disease. And cures are not an option. The present aging population have bodies that have already suffered damages from age and chronic conditions. And a cure for most conditions are still being investigated.
Simply puts, for millions of Americans (consisting of those who are driving the bulk of healthcare expenses), the thorny issue is ways to provide much better management of recurring wellness issues, and of age-related troubles.
More on Care versus Cure…
We all desire to avoid chronic illnesses, such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease from getting worse, or at least slow the progression. Addressing aging issues and prevention will address avoiding falls when balance becomes affected, and cognitive issues to prevent or delay dementia.
The focus, right now should be to strive to prevent needless suffering of care givers and their family members with dementia. Disease and age-related decreases are undoubtedly challenging for everyone. However, things are even harder due to our uncoordinated health care system that remains. The inability to offer top quality primary care and person-centered care, especially focused dementia care, to most patients in our present system.
If it’s not some sort of chronic medical condition that leaves an older person disabled and the family caregiver overwhelmed, it’ll most likely be some other type of aging issue. Maybe we’ll find a treatment for Alzheimer’s, however we’ll still have vascular dementia. (Plus any treatment for Alzheimer’s is at least 20 years away from prevalent medical use, if not more.).
I’m not against prevention or development. I’m simply against the fact that these organizations like Calico, or the Alzheimer’s Association are continuously gobbling up the limelight for prevention and a cure.
More on Care versus Cure…
For those of us interested in a maturing America, there are some cutting-edge healthcare models being established, some of which may get older people off the medical merry-go-round.
It is apparent to me, Google is not going to help the present aging population and their family members. Those individuals who advocate healthier eating routines, as a remedy for our health care ills, are not going to be much use to me either.
Should we be dealing with age as something to be treated, or fended off? Or should we roll up our sleeves and determine how you can better assist the present day seniors and families through the challenges that most of them will live with for years?
Truly, we need both. Particularly, more of the support for the challenges that the family caregiver will face.
Now, who wants to direct a lot of money and brainpower to innovations for providing quality standards for caring for those with dementia, rather than focusing on just a cure? Money is in research that will promote the continued growth of Big Pharma.
It must start here, with all of us, sharing stories of daily living. The family caregiver is, and will remain, the experts on dementia. Living with the disease, learning and sharing what works and does not work, is a grassroots effort towards developing quality person centered dementia care.
Let me know your thoughts on this subject.